The 802.1x protocol was specifically meant to provide access control. I do not rely on Fing for anything but monitoring - it's access control feature, is in my professional opinion, too easily spoofed. Guest users are on an entirely separate VLAN and get routed to the internet without ever seeing my primary network.Īll the address assignments are easily seen in my Ubiquiti controller (plus a backup spreadsheet) so any device that pops up can quickly be identified. There is a very small range (5 IP) available for devices to connect and those addresses are limited by 802.1x to a very narrow range of access (enough to get them on the network, reachable to be configured). I use static DHCP for all devices, with switches, APs, printers and similar devices with manually assigned static IP.
Not to mention the normal range of laptops, tablets, smartphones.
#Lwip netmap plus#
For example, I have 123 IoT devices (light bulbs, sensors, smart plugs, etc), 8 Alexa units, 16 IP cameras, plus printers, smart TV, smart appliances (fridge, washer, dryer, stove, etc), various roku boxes, etc.
Start turning things off, including the devices that already recognized and heck for that IP going offlineĪnd this is why I keep a record of every device on my network and use static DHCP to assign addresses, along with defined pool for 'guest' devices. Webwolf said: I'd go with the process of elimination.
0 kommentar(er)
